Governance & Ownership
Responsibilities, policies, approvals, and decision-making.
AI Governance & Adoption Review
Artificial intelligence is entering product, engineering, and operations faster than the processes needed to govern it.
Identify which AI systems your organization is actually using, where risks exist, and what to prioritize to increase adoption in a safe, traceable, and operable way.
The context
A single organization may have employee tools, AI capabilities built into products, agents with system access, and automations created by different teams.
Without a cross-functional view, leadership and Technology may not know:
The goal is not to slow AI down. It is to use more AI with greater visibility and control.
Who it is for
The assessment
Responsibilities, policies, approvals, and decision-making.
Tools, models, vendors, integrations, and use cases.
Data, confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property, and flows.
Identity, permissions, logging, RAG, agents, and system access.
Supervision, quality, reliability, transparency, and boundaries.
Models, vendors, dependencies, contracts, and third parties.
Training, approved tools, and responsible use.
Monitoring, incidents, change, and lifecycle.
The process
We understand strategy, main use cases, and the technology context.
We speak with Technology, Security, Legal/DPO, leadership, and business stakeholders where relevant.
We assess the organization using a structured framework.
We identify risks, gaps, opportunities, and quick wins.
We turn findings into priorities for the next 90 days.
Deliverables
Initial map of AI systems, tools, and use cases.
Structured view of maturity by area. It is not a certification.
Situations requiring priority attention.
Main risks, gaps, and pending decisions.
Opportunities for productivity, automation, and new capabilities.
Actions that can be implemented quickly.
Priorities, owners, and recommended sequence.
Session to present conclusions and decide next steps.
The difference
AI Governance should not be treated only as a legal or documentation exercise. The main risks and opportunities sit at the intersection of architecture, data, product, engineering, security, vendors, and the business.
The Review is approached from a CTO perspective: understanding both how systems are built and operated and the business context in which they need to create value.
Technology + Product + Risk + Business
Risk and adoption
Governance should not become a brake on adoption. It should be the infrastructure that lets it scale.
What comes next
Understand the current state and set priorities.
Implement policies, workflows, architecture, controls, and technical solutions.
Support technology, architecture, product, and AI evolution over time.
Scope
The assessment can help structure requirements related to governance, privacy, security, or applicable regulation.
The Review is not a legal or regulatory certification. Where needed, specific matters should be validated with the relevant legal or data protection owners.
AI Governance & Adoption Review
An initial conversation helps us understand the context and determine whether an AI Governance & Adoption Review can add value.